The capriccio is an almost extinct genre of
art. The trends of the late 19th century were inimitable to it, and it was not
such a robust growth that it could survive either Adolf Loo's pronouncement
that "all ornament is crime" or Monet's urge for unvarnished truth.
For a capriccio
is by definition both ornamental and false.
Nor did
it get a chance to revive during the 20th century, for a capriccio is also whimsical, and whimsy is
the enemy of modernism. Since the '90s, of course, you could paint what you
wanted, and there are talented folk out there reviving the art of imaginary
landscapes.
Certainly
in the realm of game and movie design this is big business, but somehow doing
it by committee for a team-built end product doesn't feel very whimsical.
And
there's no doubt that some amazing images have been created, so I shouldn't
complain. Being unable to live up to Pirenesi is not really a criticism.
As for
myself, my contribution is more modest. It's a paper plate. I did try something
bigger a little while ago.
I did it during a conference lecture. The lecture was not boring; it was inspiring.
No comments:
Post a Comment